My Practicum can be viewed in my other blog Vickie Views
I choose Disaster Preparedness. Living in Florida and working at a coastal hospital for over 20 years as both a LPN and a RN, I volunteered on our team. We had mock disasters from train derailments, chemical spills, hurricanes, and plane crashes. I had fun practicing setting up decontamination tents and putting on the "zoot suit". Thankfully I never had to use what I learned in real life.
I hope this helps demonstrate the format required in the paper.
There are many links, notes, and resources to help other brave LPNs with the on line challenges of bridging to become a RN. This is an on-going record of the trials and triumphs of my journey to reach my goal to become a Registered Nurse via Excelsior College's Nursing Program. My journey continues as I further my education and career. I hope my notes and resources help other students on their journey.
Thursday, March 6, 2014
EBT1 Task 2 Research Integration
EBT1
Task 2 Research Integration
Victoria
Hart
Western
Governors University
A. Review of the
Sources of Evidence
Name of Source
Author
|
A1. Types of
Sources of Evidence
|
A2.
Appropriateness of Sources of Evidence
|
A3.
Classification of Sources of Evidence
|
In text
citation
|
Classify the
type of each source of evidence as either a general information resource, a
filtered resource, or an unfiltered resource.
|
Discuss
whether each source of evidence is appropriate for this nursing practice
situation.
|
Classify each
source of evidence as primary research, evidence summary, evidence-based
guideline, or none of these.
|
("Diagnosis and management," 2004)
|
This source is
a filtered resource as it identifies a question of whether to wait to treat
acute otitis media or to initiate antibiotic therapy immediately.
|
This source is
appropriate for this nursing practice situation. It is peer reviewed and
received formal approval by partnering organizations. This study is data 2004
therefore a more current source may be of value to support of dispute the
recommendations and opinions of this guideline.
|
This source is
an evidenced based guideline.
|
(Block, 1997)
|
This is a filtered
resource as the author identifies the problem of resistance to antibiotic
therapy and provides a summary of the most effective course to therapy.
|
This source is
inappropriate for this nursing practice. It is dated 1997, the research is
not current however the results support the trend of the resistance to
antibiotics in causative organisms. There is no research on waiting to
initiate treatment
|
This source
includes primary research and an evidence summary
|
(Kelly, Friedman & Johnson,
2007)
|
This source is
general information as it is from a textbook.
|
This is an
appropriate source for the practice as it provides the background information
to explain the practice guideline.
|
This source is
an evidence-based guideline
|
(McCracken,
1998)
|
This source is
a filtered resource as it contains information that can help decide a course
of action in response to a problem.
|
This is an
appropriate source for the practice as it provides research data and
information to explain the potential evidence practice guideline.
|
This source is
a primary source.
|
Interviews
|
Interviews are
general information.
|
Interviews are
appropriate as they provide the current beliefs of the parents of the
children being treated in the clinic. It is important to evaluate this source
to determine how implementation will be achieved.
|
This source is
a primary. It is research conducted by the clinic staff.
|
B1. Watchful Waiting
Watchful waiting
is an appropriate approach for treating children under certain conditions base
on the article “Clinical Practice
Guideline”. This article gives the evidence-based statement that allowing
48-72 hours before prescribing antibiotics is an option to be considered by
clinicians. Included in this study are children up to age 12. The observation
option applies to the children greater than age 2, without other chronic
illnesses or anatomic abnormalities. The recommendation was based on placebo
controlled trails that spanned 30 years. This article includes results the AHRQ
evidence-report, the Dutch College of General Practitioners guidelines, and a
randomized trial in the United Kingdom as part of the evidence in making the
recommending. In conclusion it is imperative to ascertain the history of acute
onset, to identify signs of middle ear effusion or inflammation, the child must
be within the appropriate age, the severity of the illness must be considered
and an assurance of follow-up obtained ("Diagnosis and management,"
2004).
C. Application of
Findings
The process of
applying the findings in “Diagnosis and
management of acute otitis media” into practice would include education of
the clinical staff. A team to implement the change should be created, a team
leader should be appointed to help educate and gain acceptance of the
evidenced-based guideline. This includes education of the entire staff and
cliental. The physicians must agree to the change. A pilot group should be
formed to implement the new guidelines; this will allow for adjustments or
added education to be put into place. Collect benchmarks of current success
rates and re-occurrences of acute otitis media (AOM) to compare with the EBG
once implemented. Rolling out new treatment recommendations in increments will
make it easier for the staff and clients to adjust and accept the change; it
will also provide the opportunity to make any necessary adjustments. Communicating
the change and the rationale to the parents of the children affected by the
practice will gain their support and understanding providing compliancy with
follow-up evaluation. A policy outlining criteria to be implemented will
solidify the change as a standard of practice within the organization. (Titler,
M.G., 2008)
D. Ethical Issues
The three main
ethical concerns of research studies are autonomy, beneficence, and justice.
Autonomy recognizes the participant is capable of giving informed consent. This
includes a thorough explanation of the benefits and risks. Beneficence includes
protecting the participant’s privacy and confidentiality, providing information
that may arise during the course of the study to protect or prevent harm and
maintaining the safety of the participant. Justice provides compensation for
the participation in the study in the event they were in a group that did not
receive the best treatment or in the event that their condition worsened as a
result of the study. (Callahan & Hobbs, October)
D1. Issues
Vulnerable
populations include various ethnic groups, the elderly, prisoners, handicapped
individuals, mentally ill or handicapped, prisoners, women, poverty stricken
and children. It is required that information is presented in a language that
is understandable to them. Confidentiality must be guaranteed, they have the
right to refuse or withdraw from the study at anytime. Any questions that are
asked by them must be answered in a manner that they understand. Under no
circumstances may they be harmed or exploited. (Gaines, 2006)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)